[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Corum's Resonator Theory
From: richard hull[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 1997 10:09 AM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Corum's Resonator Theory
snip
> Also, I didn't say so in that post but there is also the
>suggestion from C&C that the two frequencies present in the system
>coalesce into Fr when the primary lets go of the resonator. I don't
>buy that either. While one sees two frequencies in the frequency
>domain, one quite clearly sees the time varying voltage waxing and
>waning at Fr as pri-sec transfers proceed. Personally I am quite
>happy with what the scope shows happening in the time domain as
>regards secondary frequency and amplitude. Absence of evidence of
>coherence to me suggests the secondary already is coherent as Bert
>has suggested.
>
>Thanks for the thoughts. Any more or anyone else, please post. I am
>not out to put C&C down. I just want to understand this thing.
>
>Regards,
>Malcolm
>
>
If we grant the Corums their wishes (No top load and no spark issuing) we
don't have OUR Tesla coil anymore. We have their's and it is a radiator by
the granting of their wishes.....Not a sparker.
Richard Hull, TCBOR