Re: Twins

• To: tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Twins
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 23:06:52 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

Subject: Re: Twins
  Date:  Fri, 30 May 1997 23:45:07 -0400 (EDT)
  From:  richard hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
    To:  Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>


At 07:57 AM 5/28/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Subject:  Re: Twins
>  Date:   Tue, 27 May 1997 19:48:45 -0500 (CDT)
>  From:   rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com (Richard Wayne Wall)
>    To:   Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>
>
>RH wrote: 
>
>snip
>
>>We did a lot of this type of thing in what we called "free resonance"
>>work
>>back in 1991 as we developed the magnifier systems here. the coupling
>>between the systems was more by direct(ground) and capacitive coupling
>>as
>>the mag coupling was truly 0.0
>>
>>Richard Hull, TCBOR
>>
>>
>
>Richard,
>
>What happens when a grounded Faraday shield is placed between the two 
>matched resonating coils?
>
>RWW
>
>
A large sheet of aluminum interposed between system had little effect,
until
it was gounded and then the sparks diminished accordingly. The sheet
acted
as a large capacitive load nearer the secondary than the free coil, thus
robbing it of capacitive coupled energy.

Richard Hull, TCBOR

• Prev: Re: Problems with Electrical Authorities
• Next: Re: Secondary wire size
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread