[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Hot Wire Metering
Subject: Re: Hot Wire Metering
Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 19:40:40 +0000
From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
At 02:14 PM 5/30/97 +0000, you wrote:
>Subject: Hot Wire Metering
> Date: Thu, 29 May 97 19:25:56 EDT
> From: pierson-at-ggone.ENET.dec-dot-com
>
>
>>Measuring the input power to a Tesla coil is not an easy job if you
>>want accuracy.
> Yea and verily, but:
>
>>All standard voltmeters, ammeters, and wattmeters are accurate
>>only with sinusoidal currents
> Depends on the definition of 'standard'. I consider hot wire
> to be one of the 'standard meters'. If 'standard' is defined
> as 'd'arsonval moving coil' (which is the MOST COMMON meter),
> i concur.
>
>>and TC currents are not sinusoidal.
> Yeah verily.
>
>>Note that all wattmeters are instantaneous.
> WHICH 'all wattmeters'?
> for 'classic four wire 'true' wattmeters' moreso than might
> appear, but with the iron cores and the voltage coil,
> especially, having many turns, they get squirelly up above
> the mid audio range.
> Modern electronic wattmeters, as noted, are likely better, but
> STILL have a roll off somewhere.
>
>>Hot wire ammeters are frequency sensitive because of the wire motion.
> Two sorts of 'frequency sensitivity'. Properly constructed
> hot wire techniques are usable up to RF, and were so used in the
> past. The WON'T track 'instantaneous' changes, of course, they
> won't indicate peak currents, but for currents of any frequency
> within the design range they will do real well for slowish
> changing currents..
>
> (I have a Boonton (?) Model 80 Signal generator, state of the
> art for its time, the calibration is set by hot-wire
> techniques up to the 100s MHz region)
>
> regards
> dwp
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
DWP -
Thanks for the comments. I always wonder if I am overlooking the some
of
the many possibilities when it comes to Tesla coil engineering. One
method
to measure current I did not mention is the use of a lamp. I found the
lamp
method is much easier to build and cheaper than the hot wire meter.
Do you also have a Boonton 265 Q Meter? If you have, I have the rare
Q
Factor article from the Boonton 'Notebook' spring '54. If you are
interested
I will send a copy for a SASE.
John Couture