Re: Just One Pop (Faraday Screen)

• To: tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Just One Pop (Faraday Screen)
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 11:17:27 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

Subject:  Re: Just One Pop (Faraday Screen)
  Date:   Wed, 21 May 1997 07:25:39 -0500 (CDT)
  From:   rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com (Richard Wayne Wall)
    To:   Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>


5/21/97

RH wrote: 

snip

>>The Faraday Screen while effectively screening 
>>the negative electrostatic field from the Teflon wiggle wand had no 
>>effect on the TC carrier or mechanism that induced the negative 
>>charge on the electrometer ball. 
>>
>>RWW
>>
>>
>Nice experiments Richard.
>
>These agree with some we had placed on a recent tape where a faraday
>shield didn't seem to affect the TC output as recorded on the Keithley
>electrometers.
>
>Richard Hull, TCBOR

The real impact of this experiment is that a Faraday screen effectively 
blocks electrometer detection of a negatively charged Teflon wiggle 
wand.  This indicates the TC mechanism of electrostatic charging of 
distant bodies is separate and apart from conventional electrostatic 
behavior.

• Prev: Re: Neon murder
• Next: Re: Neon murder
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread