[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: 70 columns
Subject: Re: 70 columns
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 11:24:03 -0500
From: David Huffman <huffman-at-FNAL.GOV>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Hi All,
I just adjusted my mailer to see if word wrapping will come out
better. I now have it set to 70 columns and hope my postings are
readable. I too find some posts are very difficult to read. It may
not be settable by many of the subscribers.
This is a test, this is only a test.
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
12345
Huffman
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: 70 columns
> Date: Monday, May 05, 1997 12:34 AM
>
> Subject: Re: 70 columns
> Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 11:53:30 -0500
> From: rickh-at-ghg-dot-net (Rick Holland)
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> References:
> 1
>
>
> Tesla List wrote:
>
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > AAAaaarrrgghhh!!!
> >
> > Will you =please= limit your line-lengths to 70 columns,
> > more or less? Else, if you are using "Navigator" for
> > e-mail, refrain from hitting <RETURN> unless you are
> > starting a new paragraph.
> >
> > We =all= thank you.
> >
> > An old softie, in -
> > Detroit, USA
> >
> > Robert Michaels
>
> --
> I'm one of the guilty parties using Netscape and hitting return to
> truncate line length. I did this because I thought that if I let my
> lines wrap around on their own, it might cause the difficulty
you've
> been describing with >70 column posts. This post is in the way of a
test
> and especially an apology to the list if I have been causing
reading
> difficulties.
>
> Rick Holland
>
> The Answer is 42.
>