[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
--
Subject:
Re: 2 wires
Date:
Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:57:58 -0500 (EST)
From:
richard hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
To:
Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
At 12:36 AM 3/26/97 -0600, you wrote:
>Subject:
> 2 wires
> Date:
> Tue, 25 Mar 1997 21:11:28 -0800
> From:
> Gary Weaver <gweaver-at-earthlink-dot-net>
> To:
> tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>
>
>I just talked to a friend that is a Professor at the local University.
>He said he had a student that built a Tesla Coil as a class
>project a few years ago. The student wound the secondary coil with 2
>wires in parallel. The wires were #24 solded together
>at both ends and both wound on the PVC pipe together side by side.
>
>#24 wire is .0201 diameter. This would be equal in width to #18 wire
>.043 diameter. Two #24 wires in parallel would be
>equal to one #21 wire in circular mil area. Two #24 wires in parallel
>would be equal to one #21 in wire resistance. Within less
>than 1%.
>
>Has anyone tried this?
>
>This would make the coil longer and may be a disadvantage because of the
>diameter to length ratio.
>
>This gives me an idea. What if I were to wind a coil with #24 wire then
>wind another coil right over the 1st coil and connect
>them both in parallel. This would make the diameter to length ratio
>smaller.
>
>Has anyone tried this or know if will work?
>
>Gary Weaver
>
>
Gary,
The first scenario you speak of is called "bifilar winding" and for my
money
it is a great waste of time, effort and wire! The things never work out
as
good as a coil wound with the proper wire in the first place and hold
back
the coil's inductance, which is a big no-no.
Your plan of over winding a second layer has been tried by Tesla himself
and
it failed due to larger sheet capacitance between windings. However, do
what I did in the beginning... go against the common wisdom. Give it a
try.
We here in Richmond found a number of the old axioms for coil building
just
a "load of hooey" when we went again the "accepted wisdom" and found new
and
different ways which were just as good, or in a few cases, even better
than
what was accepted.
Richard Hull, TCBOR