[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Coily Things
Subject:
Re: Coily Things
Date:
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 10:35:57 +1200
From:
"Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
Organization:
Wellington Polytechnic, NZ
To:
tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Hi all,
As promised, here with Mark's permission is part of a post
to me relating the side frequencies to k. I have snipped personal
bits and irrelevancies from the post and inserted an additional note.
Malcolm
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 03:33:17 -0600 (CST)
From: mrbarton-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com (Mark Barton)
Subject: Re: Coily Things
To: "Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
I've got some cool equations for you that I worked out a while
ago which relate f1 & f2 to K. Since f1 = fo/sqrt(1-K) and f2 =
fo/sqrt(1+K) ... squishing we get fo = sqrt(2/(1/f1^2 + 1/f2^2))
This relates the 3 frequencies and K. Further squishing gives the
magical equation: K = 1 - 2 / (1 + (f2^2 / f1^2)).
This means that you can set up a coil, short the spark gap, connect
a signal generator to the primary, sweep for the two peak freqs,
and then DIRECTLY COMPUTE K!! I like this method because it is so
direct and gives the real effective K value.
<SIDE NOTE>: I have used this same method for some years now. However,
I have used the approximation of k = df/F (which is in close agreement
for k's of .2 or less) - MW <END NOTE>.
>- Greg Leyh has been examining some successful coils and has reached
>the conclusion that a Zs of around 40 - 50 kOhms is a useful value to
>reach in the secondary. I can't remember whether that was including or
>minus the terminal but I think it was including.
>
My experience has been the higher the Zsec the better.
ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzt,
--MB