-- BEGIN included message
- To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
- Subject: Re: Optimal Quenching
- From: "Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 11:29:53 +1200
- Organization: Wellington Polytechnic, NZ
- Priority: normal
Hi all, Having done experiments with a MOSFET "gap" system last year, I'd like to make a few comments on John Freau's post and ask a few questions. First, why do sidebands occur (and increase as quench time is increased)? If you look at a quarter cycle of ring, it has a well defined amplitude, right? No change in amplitude = no sideband production. If you look at a half cycle, you now see a change in amplitude. Spectrally decomposing this there are now several frequencies present, the centre frequency and two sidebands of rather low amplitude. As the time over which you examine the amplitude-changing-waveform increases, the sideband amplitudes increase at the expense of centre frequency amplitude until you decompose a complete beat envelope at which point, the centre frequency is entirely suppressed and the sideband amplitude hits a maximum. This spectrum is not intuitively obvious when you look at the waveform in the time domain. What you see there is the centre frequency whose amplitude is changing. I did exactly what John did and increased the dwell time progessively. What I saw was the secondary amplitude increase in proportion to the dwell until the point (1/2kF approx) at which no energy remained in the primary to be transferred. At no stage did I see the secondary reach that amplitude when cutting the dwell time shorter. I didn't expect to because loose coupling kept a high proportion of the primary energy more closely coupled to the primary than the secondary. On cutting dwell time to that of a quarter cycle, I got enormous spikes across the parasitic primary capacitances as the energy still coupled to the primary coil dumped itself into those strays when the cutoff gap disconnected Cp from the primary coil. It never coupled into the secondary for the most part. Cutting conduction time off at half a cycle left a reversal on the cap as I described in the SCR post. Question: Did you (John) manage to get all primary energy into the secondary in just 1/4 cycle of oscillation despite the loose coupling? I would love to know how this is possible. I think I'll repeat those expts over the Easter break when I'll have time. Malcolm
-- END included message