[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: text of july 1964 popular electronics article on tesla coils (fw d) (fwd)
-
To: tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: text of july 1964 popular electronics article on tesla coils (fw d) (fwd)
-
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
-
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 23:59:19 -0600
-
Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net
-
References: <970304200333_1249740048-at-emout19.mail.aol-dot-com>
Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 97-03-04 07:47:53 EST, you write:
>
> << From: William Noble <William_B_Noble-at-msn-dot-com>
> To: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: RE: text of july 1964 popular electronics article on tesla coils
> (fw d)
>
> What bugs me about this isn't that the coil didn't work - I think I
> understand
> the tuning part now, what bugs me is that the cover of the magazine has a
> photograph of the coil working. So, it seems to me that I ought to be able
> to
> duplicate that, even if it's a crummy design. - I'm using a commercial
> capacitor, not a plate of glass, maybe that has something to do with it. I
>
> did try the following experiments:
>
> 1. added a metal toilet float to the top - small increase in arc, maybe -
> hard
> to tell
> 2. wrapped primary around a vinyl sheet rolled into an 8" diameter tube, and
>
> spread the windings out to about 1/2 inches apart. no change.
> 3. tapped the primary (I wound 30 turns total) at turns 20, 15. Small
> improvement at turn 20, 15 about the same. much better if I ran 1o turns -
> e.g. turn 30 to turn 20. about the same at 5 turns (e.g. 15 to 20). At the
>
> smaller turns on the primary configuration, the secondary would arc through
> the vinly (.30, two layers) to the primary from about the midpoint of the
> secondary. These arc were longer than I could draw off the top. This
> confirms
> to me that the coil is about twice as long as it ought to be.
> 3. messed around with the length of the spark gap. no effect - either it
> worked or it didn't - tuning the arc was ineffective.
>
> I haven't tried giving the secondary a good ground - per my prev post, the
> schematic has pri low side and sec low side tied together, so given that the
>
> CT of the sign Xformer is also grounded, this is impossible. I will try
> isolating pri and sec and grounding Sec low side to Xformer case and see
> what
> happens.
>
> I think I may also try making a plate glass capacitor exactly like the
> article
> - that (it says it's .00027) is about triple what my capacitor seems to be
> labeled. Maybe I'll also meaure my capacitor and see what it's value is -
> since the label is corroded, I could have misread it.
>
> (and, yes, I'll make a half length secondary soon, but first, there is this
> small matter of a trip to abu dhabi...)
> >>
> William,
>
> Sounds like you are making some progress. You really aren't going to make a
> lot of headway as it sits because it is so far out of tune. If you cut the
> secondary in half, you will still need a .006 mfd cap. These are resonant
> systems and just don't perform unless the tank circuit and the secondary are
> in tune. I would suggest making a new flat pancake primary out of 1/4"
> copper tubing, 14 turns with about .30" spacing between turns and 6.0" inside
> dia. This will allow some room for tuning so you can add a toroid. You
> should be able to get 12" to 16" sparks out of this thing with a 12kv 30 ma
> transformer.
>
> Have fun in the desert.
>
> Ed Sonderman