[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tesla turns ratio ? (Slone)
Subject: Re: Tesla turns ratio ?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 20:03:14 -0600
From: "DR.RESONANCE" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net>
To: "Tesla List" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Hi Gary:
It's only a paper not a book. Sloan discusses the losses briefly but
then
rapidly discusses the various circuit configurations and why he used one
particular type. He was drive his circuit with a 150 kw pair of triodes
at
15 kv running continuous wave mode. Output was around 100-110 kw with 1
megavolt. Output was determined by rectified x-rays and measuring
energy
similar to the method we used previously with a 1 mev spark excited
coil.
GE engineers took over after the prototype was developed by Sloan and
marketed a number of these devices. After more efficient 1 mev iron
type
transformers were developed the Sloan 180 cps resonant system sort of
went
out of vogue.
It was a great effort and Sloan does give a lot of credit to Tesla
especially in other papers he published.
Happy reading.
DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Tesla turns ratio ?
> Date: Sunday,June 15,1997 9:50 PM
>
> Subject: Re: Tesla turns ratio ?
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 15:43:02 -0800
> From: Greg Leyh <lod-at-pacbell-dot-net>
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> References: 1
>
>
> DR.RESONANCE wrote:
>
> > With regards to your question on max energy and efficiency you might
> > wish
> > to look up the two following articles and study them in detail.
> >
> > A Radio-Frequency High Voltage Generator
> > D.H. Sloan Physical Review vol 47 Jan. 1, 1935 pp.62-70
> >
> > Sloans proclaims efficiencies of only 50% or less with the classic
> > coupled
> > tuned circuit coil system and then he goes on to discuss (and develops)
> > the
> > tightly tuned circuit in a wave guide like tank system.
>
>
> DR.RESONANCE,
>
> In his book, does Sloan give a breakdown as to which elements of the
> circuit contribute to the losses?
>
> -GL