[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Flat Spiral Tesla Coils (low temp)




From: 	DR.RESONANCE[SMTP:DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net]
Sent: 	Wednesday, July 02, 1997 2:14 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Flat Spiral Tesla Coils

To: Bert

Use caution -- at these temps most "normal" insulations will become so
brittle that they will crack and fall off your wire -- we learned this the
hard way.  Special insulations must be used and they are quite expensive.

DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net


----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: 'Tesla List' <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: Re: Flat Spiral Tesla Coils
> Date: Tuesday,July 01,1997 11:16 PM
> 
> 
> From: 	Bert Pool[SMTP:bertpool-at-flash-dot-net]
> Sent: 	Tuesday, July 01, 1997 6:06 PM
> To: 	Tesla List
> Subject: 	Re: Flat Spiral Tesla Coils
> 
> > 
> > From: 	Richard Wayne Wall[SMTP:rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com]
> > Sent: 	Monday, June 30, 1997 5:46 PM
> > To: 	Tesla List
> > Subject: 	Flat Spiral Tesla Coils
> > 
> > 6/30/97
> > 
> > Nikola Tesla in the June issue of the 1919 Electrical Experimenter 
> > wrote the fifth article in a series called "My Inventions".  In this 
> > article he states that his laboratory was destroyed by fire in 1995.  
> > 
> > NT wrote, " .   .   .   .  This calamity set me back in many ways and 
> > most of that year had to be devoted to planning and reconstruction.  
> > However, as soon as circumstances  permitted, I returned to the task.  
> > Although I knew that higher electro-motive forces were attainable with 
> > apparatus of larger dimensions, I had an instinctive perception that 
> > the object could be accomplished by the proper design of a 
> > comparatively small and compact transformer.  In carrying on the tests 
> > with a secondary in the form of a flat spiral, as illustrated in my 
> > patents, the absence of streamers surprised me and it was not long 
> > before I discovered  that this was due to the position of the turns and

> > their mutual action.  Profiting from this observation I resorted to the

> > use of a high tension conductor with turns of considerable diameter 
> > sufficiently separate to keep down the distributed capacity, while at 
> > the same time preventing undue accumulation of the charge at any point 

> > The application of this principle enabled me to produce pressures of 
> > 4,000,000 volts which was about the limit obtainable in  my new lab
> > oratory at Houston Street as the discharges extended through a distance

> > of 16 feet.  A photograph of this transmitter was published in the 
> > Electrical Review of November, 1998.  .   .   .  "   
> > 
> > Tesla goes on to say that he had to go out in the open and this 
> > ultimately was why he went to Colorado Spring in 1999 where he remained

> > for more than one year. 
> > 
> > Recently, others on this list have had NT's same experience of very 
> > unimpressive flat spiral discharges.  Tesla nailed the problem of high 
> > interturn distributed capacitance and seems to have corrected it with 
> > spaced windings and high tension conductors.  I'm not sure he could 
> > accurately measure a 4,000,000 volt discharge, but he could probably 
> > quite accurately measure a 16 foot discharge.  To wit, our TC 
> > measurement technologies have not changed that much in a century.
> > 
> > None the less, Tesla was quite successful in design and function of his

> > flat spiral geometries which were far more compact than his helical 
> > coils.  To that end, perhaps we should investigate the various 
> > parameters of flat spiral secondaries such as distributed capacities 
> > and inductances as we do in the helical varieties.  After 
> > "conventional" flat spiral secondaries are re-researched, a logical 
> > extension would advance to "magnifier" spiral secondaries.  And, 
> > ultimately flat spirals in liquid N2.
> > 
> >RWW
> 
> And it is for similar future experiments that I have 
> acquired a 40 liter dewar flask for storing a large quantity of 
> liquid N2!  My first low temperature tests will be with a 
> conventional "extra" coil, but I too am fascinated with the 
> possibilities of large flat spiral secondaries.  It will be far 
> easier to insulate and immerse a small extra coil like Richard Hull's 
> "E" coil (approx. 4 inch by 12 inch) than a flat spiral.
> 
> Bert Pool
> bertpool-at-flash-dot-net
> 
>