[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Bigger top = bigger sparks
From: Bert Pool[SMTP:bertpool-at-flash-dot-net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 1997 6:06 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Bigger top = bigger sparks
>
> From: Chuck Curran[SMTP:ccurran-at-execpc-dot-com]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 1997 8:30 PM
> To: Tesla List
> Subject: Re: Bigger top = bigger sparks
>
> Tesla List wrote:
> >
> > From: Bert Pool[SMTP:bertpool-at-flash-dot-net]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 28, 1997 8:10 PM
> > To: Tesla List
> > Subject: Bigger top = bigger sparks
> >
> > We just had an excellent Tesla magnifier run, with measured sparks 11
> > feet in length. We were running a 62 inch diameter toroid with an 8
> > inch cross section stacked on top of two 36 by 8 inch toroids.
[big, big snip]
>
> Bert:
> Sounds like you really had things going well! 4 1/2 minutes of run time
> is pretty respectable for a new system still being developed. I have
> kept my two coil system to about 2 minutes and was happy that nothing
> got too upset this last Friday. The toroid stack must look pretty neat
> too--do the cars slow down when you are just setting up, trying to
> figure out what you're doing?
This time we set up in the back yard and I got to use my good ground
that I worked so hard to bury. The only neighbors who got to watch
were my back door neighbors who got invited to come on over.
>Your comment about the transmission line
> flapping in the breeze caught my attention. I have been wondering what
> would happen if all of us who run our coils outside in the wind, could
> one day take them inside and not let the wind disrupt our "ionized
> air". I bet your 11' spark would stretch out some more, based on
> comments heard before. Hope you are able to post a photo of the system
> when time permits, too bad about the damaged/dead welder.
>
> I tried taking a time exposure Friday night of my coil running. I had
> an older Konica camera that was funtional last year but this year it
> gave up the ghost. Next I got two really old Leica cameras from my
> Uncle's estate when he passed away and I tried one of them, knowing that
> a 1939 vintage camera would be 100% mechanical--it doesn't work yet
> either. Last resort was my new Minolta, which I took one shot with and
> then it did some odd things. It's still O.K.--I knew I should not try
> it so close to the coil, but I really wanted to get a photo to post!
> Well, I'll get the one developed and see if it turned out or not. If
> not, I'll keep trying. Sunday my wife asked me what happened to the
> Flowering Crab tree. A whole bunch of leaves were dead--wilted and
> brown where the coil had hit them during the run. Neighbors from six
> houses down the road came by to watch that big bug zapper run, as they
> called it.
>
> Chuck Curran
>
Wild Bill Emery's camcorder gets very upset with the magnifier, and
my 35 mm camera has to be kept far from the driver coils or it goes
crazy too. I have kept my coils from hitting any of our trees so
far.
Bert Pool
bertpool-at-flash-dot-net