Re: Calculating Sec. Voltage

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Calculating Sec. Voltage
• From: Ed Harris <harris-at-parkave-dot-net>
• Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 16:38:18 -0500
• Subscriber: harris-at-parkave-dot-net Tue Feb 11 23:18:40 1997

    [The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set]
    [Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
    [Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]



> 
> Subscriber: lod-at-pacbell-dot-net Mon Feb 10 21:30:24 1997
> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 22:38:05 -0800
> From: Greg Leyh <lod-at-pacbell-dot-net>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Calculating Sec. Voltage
>

I think you've hit the nail on the head with your statement here:.
(Though I'll continue my straw-man battles with Richard Hull.)

 
> Theoretical modeling is frustratingly hard work, which is why most people
avoid 
> it like the plague!  It becomes more attractive however, when human lives
or 
> large sums of money are at stake, and there might not be a second chance.
> 
> At the least, a basic theoretical background is useful for detecting and
avoiding 
> the ever-present 'fringe science' menace, or even just simple mistakes.
> 
> 
> -GL,  "Theoretical Evangelist"

• Prev: Re: Explanation of the positive E.S. charge
• Next: Re: Calculating Sec. Voltage
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread