Re: Grid Dip Oscillator

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: Grid Dip Oscillator
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 23:36:09 -0600
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	bmack[SMTP:bmack-at-frontiernet-dot-net]
Sent: 	Thursday, December 04, 1997 9:27 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Grid Dip Oscillator


> 
> From: 	Malcolm Watts[SMTP:MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
> Sent: 	Wednesday, December 03, 1997 4:12 PM
> To: 	Tesla List
> Subject: 	Re: Grid Dip Oscillator
> 
> Hello Ed,
> 
> > From:   Edward V. Phillips[SMTP:ed-at-alumni.caltech.edu]
> > Sent:   Monday, December 01, 1997 1:50 PM
> > To:     tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Subject:    Re: Grid Dip Oscillator
> > 
> > "
> 
> <snip>
>" That is precisely what I was trying to say. The problem ain't the 
> GDO, it's the proximity of *the person*.
> 
> Malcolm"

Malcolm:

Two ways of doing  the "dip" remotely:

1) Remove the base ground and extend it to some "safe"distance 
to minimize the loading effect.  Wrap the base lead around the dip
coil a few times.  This will couple sufficiently enough for a detectable
deflection.


2) Using inductive links where the input link inductance is equal to the
output link. (eq 1 wrap around TC to several around dip coil).

Jim McVey






 

• Prev: Re: Grid Dip Oscillator
• Next: Re: RE-: Grid Dip Oscillator (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread