Re: Oil-immersed RFCs

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: Oil-immersed RFCs
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 00:16:43 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	Michael D. Freeman[SMTP:telwave-at-pacbell-dot-net]
Reply To: 	telwave-at-pacbell-dot-net
Sent: 	Sunday, August 31, 1997 11:52 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Oil-immersed RFCs

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> From:   Felix[SMTP:73374.1547-at-CompuServe.COM]
> Sent:   Sunday, August 31, 1997 2:15 PM
> To:     tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject:        Oil-immersed RFCs
> 
> Tom,

Sorry,

I'm new and don't know anybody yet. 

My question: What kind of trouble does the FCC give to coil operators?
             Is it feasible to plan for a full time large scale
coil              operation with the same idea originally intended by
Mr.              Tesla in New Jersey?

Thanks, 

Michael Freeman

• Prev: Re: Oil-immersed RFCs
• Next: Re: Computer data
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread