Re: Aerodynamics

• To: tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Aerodynamics
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Mon, 07 Apr 1997 23:06:09 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

Subject: 
        Re: Aerodynamics
  Date: 
        Mon, 7 Apr 1997 18:53:06 -0400 (EDT)
  From: 
        richard hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
    To: 
        Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>


At 04:23 PM 4/2/97 -0600, you wrote:
>Subject: 
>            Re: Aerodynamics
>       Date: 
>            Thu, 3 Apr 1997 08:08:29 +1200
>       From: 
>            "Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
>Organization: 
>            Wellington Polytechnic, NZ
>         To: 
>            tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>
>
>Richard, all,
>              If drag isn't a problem, how about blowing a jet of air 
>straight back at the stationary contact/s?
>
>Malcolm


Malcolm,

Back after a long hamfest weekend.  I would imagine a blast of air at
the
trailing interface of fixed points might work better, but its all
acedemic
until someone with a flaming rotary tries it.

Richard Hull, TCBOR

• Prev: Re: More melted stuff
• Next: Re: Chokes
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread