Re: Gap Dwell Times (formerly: Beating Solved)

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Gap Dwell Times (formerly: Beating Solved)
From: Bert Pool <nikki-at-fastlane-dot-net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 22:18:00 -0500 (CDT)

At 02:25 PM 10/12/96 -0600, you wrote:
>>From ed-at-alumni.caltech.eduSat Oct 12 13:12:26 1996
>Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 18:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "Edward V. Phillips" <ed-at-alumni.caltech.edu>
>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject: Re: Gap Dwell Times (formerly: Beating Solved)
>
>Re: Oil immersed coils.
>	Has anyone in this group experimented with same, and if
>so, what were the results.  There certainly is precedent, going
>back to Mr. T himself.  Would be very much interested in any reports.
>How about the Richard's???
>Ed Phillips
>
>

I am building and debugging a small but massive primary/secondary magnifier
system right now which has both primary and secondary immersed in oil.
Since this list is "conventional coil" oriented, I would be glad to discuss
the specifics using direct E-mail if you are interested.

Bert Pool
nikki-at-fastlane-dot-net

[ Magnifier discussion is definitely ON TOPIC!  -- Chip ]