[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Capacitor charge, were is it?
[The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set]
[Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
[Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]
Hi All,
Thought experiments are great, aren't they! The space ship idea make me
think of a self contained TC built inside the discharge electrode, but as
Malcolm states, where would you get a counterpoise or ground? Could there
be a way to compress the charge someplace like the way a submarine
compresses the air on order to change its ballast? The inside charge would
certainly be neutralized by the outside charge.
Dave
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
> To: Tesla-list-subscribers-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Capacitor charge, were is it?
> Date: Wednesday, October 30, 1996 11:25 PM
>
> >From MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nzWed Oct 30 21:49:22 1996
> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:45:07 +1200
> From: Malcolm Watts <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Capacitor charge, were is it?
>
> Here's an interesting little poser following on from this post....
>
> > > Food for thought -
> > >
> > > >A Tesla coil can put a charge on the secondary terminal. If this
terminal
> > > is >the outside skin of a space station could a space station charged
by an
> > > on >board Tesla coil attract or repel a nearby shuttle that is
charged by
> > > it's own >Tesla coil?
> > >
> > > This could make Tesla coils very popular in the near future.
> > >
> > > >>>> Jack C. <<<<
> >
> > Jack,
> >
> > You bet it could!! This is the isotropic capacitor bit again. The
> > forces which would cause the motion are all coulombic. The forces are
> > real and viable. A number of scenarios involving space propulsion where
> > no matter is ejeced are under study at this time. This is the very
> > premise of the Electric Spacecraft Journal magazine. To investigate
> > these possiblilities. The Tesla coil has a great chance in this area.
> >
> > Richard Hull , TCBOR
>
> To charge the skin of the craft requires charge separation. I am
> assuming that the skin is, say, positively charged for one craft.
> This implies that the electrons removed from the skin are stored
> somewhere internally (if nothing is to be ejected). Questions : is
> there a nett charge on the outer skin under these conditions? Is the
> craft itself not a self-contained capacitor (no nett external field)?
> In a grounded TC we are charging the terminal at the expense of the
> ground, counterpoise or whatever, and that is external to the
> terminal.
>
> Malcolm