Re: TC Output Voltage

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: TC Output Voltage
From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 12:54:54 -0800
Tesla List wrote:
> 
> >From MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nzTue Nov  5 22:54:04 1996
> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 09:49:44 +1200
> From: Malcolm Watts <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: TC Output Voltage
> 
> Hello Richard, all,
> 
> > I've been screamin' this for years. (in articles and papers back to 1990)
> >  Antenna design, radio theory, etc, just is not what we are doing.  We
> > are headed in the other direction completely, looking to "do in" RF
> > radiation and maximize the loses in the system.  Radio folks like unity
> > VSWR.  We seek infinite VSWR.  They seek maximum electromagnetic
> > radiation and zero resisitive air losses.  We want all of our losses to
> > be resisitive and in air only, and deny the resonator or, quarter wave
> > line, a chance to produce even a whisp of RF even though it is
> > oscillating like crazy!
> >
> > Your idea sounds feasible.  I would say go for it!
> 
> I'll certainly do that once the cap problem is resolved. Good caps
> are mandatory for this exercise. I have made a fool of myself by
> using bad components in a past experiment. I have to apologize for
> coming up with a seemingly endless raft of suggestions and ideas.


An endless raft of ideas and suggestions are always held in the highest 
regard on this list, I hope!  R. Hull



> There is a good reason. I simply do not have the facilities to try
> all these things out and you and others are equipped to try these
> things in a spare moment and tell me I am speaking rubbish or
> otherwise. I cannot stop thinking though and I have no commercial
> interest so I am keen to take advantage of this wonderful list while I
> have the opportunity and help further any research.
> 
>    
> 
> Malcolm