Re: Capacitor charge, were is it?

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Capacitor charge, were is it?
From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 12:41:25 -0800

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> >> Subject: Re: Capacitor charge, were is it?
> >> Subject: Re: 50%
<SNIP>
> >> big snip
> >>
> >>>
> >Good boy Malcolm,
> >
> >Don't let 'em talk yo out of the fact of the matter.
> >
> >I did the experiment a year ago for the first time in my life with my own
> >hands or I wouldn't have gone on so long over this topic!  v/2 it is and
> >always will be.
> >
> >Richard Hull, TCBOR
> >
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> Richard -
> 
> I agree. Lets not talk anyone out of the truth. But lets not leave anyone
> with the wrong information.
> 
> Refer to my post of Nov 5. Do you see anything incorrect with my
> calculations for the two capacitor problem?
> 
> Note that you cannot use the coulomb equation for determining energy
> conservation. Also you cannot assume the 2 cap voltage. You have to
> calculate it.
> 
> You say you have performed the test. What size were the capacitors and what
> voltage did you use. What was the final voltage and was the voltage stable
> for the test?
> 
> Jack C.


Jack,

Saw your mathematical daliences of Nov 5.  I went into my  lab November 5 
 Results of multiple experiment yielding physical results posted Nov 6.
Matters not whether math was correct or flawed.  Physical results on real 
world sutff under controlled conditions supercede math results.
'Nuff said.

Richard Hull, TCBOR