Re: More real experiments

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: More real experiments
• From: Bert Hickman <bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-com>
• Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 22:26:22 -0800

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> >From huffman-at-fnal.govMon Nov 25 11:03:05 1996
> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 09:09:48 -0600
> From: huffman <huffman-at-fnal.gov>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: More real experiments
> 
> Richard,
> You must be joking! #64 wire would be 0.000194" in dia. even #46 (1.5mil)
> would be to small to wind without a machine. Let's see though, 20" dia. 48"
> long, 73300 turns Fself=427 Hz
> BTW to find wire diameter size in inches, try 0.3252*exp(-0.116*ga#).

<SNIP>

Dave 

Thanks for the formula - works great until you hit 00 and bigger!

-- Bert --

• Prev: Re: TC Electrostatics
• Next: Re: Voltage multiplier ?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread