[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Unipolar Charge
[I've lost track of the attribution so....]
>>Your arguement is similar to the chicken and the egg syndrome. Science
>>assumes charge exists because of matter. Namely because we have
>>declared it only exists in matter. Not an unreasonable assumption based
>>on simple observations. (we see it hanging around matter) Charge polarity
>>infers two observatinal points and material bodies at each to communicate
>>a differential. (THIS IS ALL IT ASSUMES) Polarity infers electrodynamic
>action also, as something has to react against something to indicate to
>>an observer, a polarity, a differential. Thus, if a naked charge exists
>>in space, any other person measureing it would automatically assume the
>>opposite charge potential.
>Are you saying that a unipolar charge can exist in real space and time?
Yes. (tho i wasn't asked.)
Conventionally, electrons, positrons, protons and idunnowhomany of
the rest of subatomic zoo have unit, unipolar charge.
Assuming the discussion is of electrical charge. Magnetic 'charge'
is a another matter. THAT seems to always occur in matched sets,
tho there are those who propose magnetic monopoles. I don't think
any have been trapped yet. 8)>>
regards
dwp