[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Secondary Coil Electrostatic Charge
-
To: tesla <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>
-
Subject: Re: Secondary Coil Electrostatic Charge
-
From: Richard Hull <whitlock-dot-com!RICHARDH-at-uucp-1.csn-dot-net>
-
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:34:00 PST
-
>Received: from valriva.whitlock-dot-com (valriva.whitlock-dot-com [198.69.64.3]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA00908 for <grendel!grendel.objinc-dot-com!tesla-at-uucp-1.csn-dot-net>; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 15:19:09 -0700
-
Encoding: 131 TEXT
I think there is more to it than the damp wave. That may explain a dc
potential on the toroid but it fails in another area as regards charge
collection on non-dielectric objects. It also limits the DC transfer
potential if the case is strickly observed. i.e. when the next ring down or
impulse of energy occurs the charge should be knocked off and a new charge
impressed. Our group has done some work that shows this charge is additive
and collected to the point of break down, It relates to the terminal size,
energy input and a number of other factors. The final brek down seems to
occur when one of the energy bursts finally adds to the net system charge
and the air catastrophically breaks down. We are looking into this now. RF
may have very little or nothing to do with certain forms of Tesla discharge.
Richard Hull, TCBOR
----------
From: tesla
To: 73663.1536; BrittB7556; JHERRON; JOHNBATES3; abourass; atech; davide;
gpaul; jbiehler; jfalcon; jmonty; kg7bz; logue; osburnw; pinsky; richardh;
rmessick; rnicker; rwstephens; shu95mmc; stevej; yiorgos
Subject: Re: Secondary Coil Electrostatic Charge
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 1996 1:35PM