[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Secondary Coil Electrostatic Charge
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Secondary Coil Electrostatic Charge
-
From: "Robert W. Stephens" <rwstephens-at-ptbo.igs-dot-net>
-
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:06:54 -0500
-
>Received: from host.ptbo.igs-dot-net (root-at-gateway.ptbo.igs-dot-net [198.53.168.8]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA04273 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 20:14:02 -0700
-
Comments: Authenticated sender is <rwstephens-at-host.ptbo.igs-dot-net>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 08:37:50 +0700
From: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
To: 73663.1536-at-compuserve-dot-com, BrittB7556-at-aol-dot-com, JOHNBATES3-at-aol-dot-com,
abourass-at-red-lake.lakeheadu.ca, atech-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com,
davide-at-mailhost.accesscom-dot-net, gpaul-at-mgl.ca, jbiehler-at-teleport-dot-com,
jfalcon-at-getnet-dot-com, jmonty-at-sat-dot-net, kg7bz-at-whitemtns-dot-com, logue-at-uis.edu,
osburnw-at-UTKVX.UTCC.UTK.EDU, pinsky-at-acc-dot-net, rmessick-at-dttus-dot-com,
rnicker-at-quartz.idbsu.edu, rwstephens-at-host.ptbo.igs-dot-net,
shu95mmc-at-reading.ac.uk, stevej-at-dji-dot-com, yiorgos-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com
Subject: Re: Secondary Coil Electrostatic Charge
>From jim.fosse-at-bdt-dot-com Tue Mar 19 01:18 MST 1996
>Received: from bdt.bdt-dot-com (root-at-bdt-dot-com [140.174.173.10]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA10856 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 21:47:30 -0700
From: jim.fosse-at-bdt-dot-com (Jim Fosse)
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
Subject: Re: Secondary Coil Electrostatic Charge
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 04:27:50 GMT
tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com On Mon, 18 Mar 1996 08:32:03 +0700, you
wrote:
>Hello Everybody,
>
>I am Robert Stephens and new to this group. I've been following your
>mail exchange for the past week with interest. The subject of
>electroststic charge being deposited on the surface of the TC
>secondary winding has been an interesting topic of discussion over
>the past few days. I see that several of you now have surmised the
>correct mechanism of storage of this charge (dielectric polarization,
>and to a lesser degree static surface charge of the insulation on the
>secondary windings), but can anyone explain WHY an alternating
>current high voltage source like a TC can charge dielectrics
>(capacitors) just like a Van de Graaff generator?
>
[snip]
>-a properly coupled TC with a well designed top load terminal, even a
>large coil driven to multi megavolt levels will have hardly any
>secondary residual surface charge after a good run.
>-an overcoupled secondary will develop firecracker hot areas of
>surface charge in a specific zone, or zones along its length. This
>occurs in those areas where the coil will begin to arc across its own
>windings if pushed hard enough.
>
YES, I've observed the same - 10 hemisphere => charge 28" toroid => no
charge.
[snip]
> IF YOU TRY THIS SAME
>EXPERIMENT WITH A VAN DE GRAAFF GENERATOR INSTEAD OF THE
>SPARK GAP DRIVEN T.C. YOU WILL GET EXACTLY THE SAME EFFECT!
>
>The answer to this phenomenon is hidden in the term DAMPED SINUSOID.
>There, I just gave it away.
>
Robert,
Given a damped wave form: at some point, the damped waveform
is to weak to cause a discharge. That leaves the previous half cycle's
charge on the object.
jim
>>Jim Fosse,
>>You're almost there, but it has nothing to do with an actual
>>discharge (corona). That first 180 degrees of the big whallop that
>>comes off the top of the TC (corona or not) goes either positive or
>>negative depending on when you look at it in reference to the
>>charging polarity of the system capacitance. Let's say it goes
>>positive +100%. During the second 180 degrees of the first RF cycle
>>it will swing negative, but since we're dealing with a 'damped
>>sinusoid' it has already diminished in amplitude, so it goes negative
>>say only -70%, it then goes positive again maybe to + 40% and then
>>negative to -20% and then quickly dies out. That big initial whallop
>>of +100% followed by an opposite or partially cancelling -70% high
>>voltage waveform leaves a residual DC charge on dielectrics in its
>>immediate area. If that 100% represents 1 megavolt (easily achieved
>>with a modest 15KV 120MA neon powered system), then that +30%
>> residual is 300,000 volts DC! At these kind of voltages even the
>> microscopic capacitance represented by a small section of plastic dielectric
>> on the outside of the secondary winding can store enough charge to give
>>a person a nasty shock!
>>Note that a vacuum tube powered Tesla coil which operates in CW,
>>generates a continuous wave train of equal amplitude, SYMMETRICAL RF
>> sinusoids and that this type of TC does not demonstrate this residual DC
>> static charging effect, on its own secondary or on nearby surfaces.
>>Happy coiling, R.W.S.