[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
High frequency impedance of a neon sign transformer
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: High frequency impedance of a neon sign transformer
-
From: EDHARRIS-at-MPS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
-
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 15:49:46 -0500 (EST)
-
>Received: from phyas1.mps.ohio-state.edu (phyas1.mps.ohio-state.edu [128.146.37.10]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA12154 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc.COM>; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 13:50:48 -0700
Hi All,
Due to the discussion on the effectiveness of chokes and bypass
capacitors in protecting one's high-voltage transformer, I was motivated to
find an answer the following question. What is the impedance of the
secondary of a pole pig/neon transformer as a function of frequency?
The answer I found for a neon sign transformer shows definitely
that one cannot consider the secondary to be a fixed inductance as a
function of frequency. I believe that the 59Henry inductance figure quoted
by Scott Meyers and others is only a very low frequency figure. So, without
further ado, here are the results of some measurements I made ona 15kV,
60ma neon:
Freq. Secondary Impedance
Primary open Primary Shorted
------------ ------------ ---------------
100Hz 1.2Mohm .38Mohm
1kHz 600kohm same
10kHz 35kohm same
100kHz 4.2kohm same
300kHz 1.8kohm same
* The impedances are the total of the reactive and resistive
componets. However, "eye balling" the scope traces suggests that the
current is always lagging the voltage by about 90 deg, so most of the
impedance is effectively inductive.
** I used a 1volt excitation for all measurements.
*** The open and shorted primary measurements show that the mutual
inductance between the primary and secondary has no effect of the secondary
impedance above about 1kHz.
I suggest that there are two reasons why the impedance is so low at high
frequencies: (1) The inter-turn capacitance in the big secondaries of these
kinds of power transformers is so great that it effectively shorts out
much of the secondary inductance as the frequency is raised. (2) It is well
known that a big 60Hz iron core cannot respond to high frequencies due to
eddy current screening. So the core "dissappears" at high frequencies and
therefore the inductance of the secondary may decrease by a factor of
around 1000 (approx permeability of silicon steel).
Note that the 4.2kohm impedance meaured at 100kHz is equvalent to
A choke inductor of 6.6mH
or bypass cap of 0.4nF
Based on this comparision, I would think that one would want more than
6.6mH of choke inductance (at 100kHz) in series with the neon and more than
.4nF of capacitance in parallel to insure that the transformer is well
protected from the high frequency and high voltage oscillations from the
tank circuit.
Comments?
-Ed Harris