Subject: Re: variacs
From: Free Resonator list <E.Young-at-mailbox.uq.oz.au>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 03:32:46 -0600
>Received: from dingo.cc.uq.oz.au (root-at-dingo.cc.uq.oz.au [184.108.40.206]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA19357 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 10:44:57 -0700
Cc: EricMT1496-at-aol-dot-com, GBaddele-at-vitgssw.ms-mail.telecom-dot-com.au, efreet-at-thelair.zynet-dot-com, gary.peterson-at-modemnet-dot-com, jbb-at-airmail-dot-net, jdf149-at-psu.edu, kbarton-at-cwis.unomaha.edu, kcravens-at-sound-dot-net, pxeyoung-at-mailbox.uq.oz.au, reking1-at-ix4.ix-dot-netcom-dot-com, rmr-at-christa.unh.edu, wesb-at-vnet.ibm-dot-com
At 09:30 AM 1/19/96 +0700, tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com wrote:
>>From chip Fri Jan 19 09:16 MST 1996
>Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:16:32 +0700
>From: chip (Chip Atkinson)
>I saw a gang of 3 phase variacs for a reasonable price ($15) at the local
>electronics surplus/supply place. However, the variacs are 400Hz instead
>of 60Hz. Does anyone know if they will work ok for 60Hz? I thought the
>main considerations with different frequencies for transformers are eddy
>current losses. If that is true, wouldn't a transformer for a higher
>frequency work fine for a lower one?
For that price, I'de be inclined to buy it for the "might come in handy for
something one day" 'excuse' to myself!
Thats not much of a frequency difference really. Bareley in the AF spectrum!
I would just buy it and test the current and voltage, and try a 'dummy load'
like light bulbs? or something? See how much wattage can be comfortably
handle without the variacs getting too warm.
I think higher frequencies are more efficient 'power for core weight' wise.
I might be right. :) Take a HF ferrite for example. These things will saturate
till theyre nearly aflame. And they can be pretty small compared to 'mains'
frequency trannys in terms of power handling.
But I dont think there would be a large difference. Of course, others may