Re: Q Values
Subject: Re: Q Values
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 12:51:23 -0500
>Received: from mail04.mail.aol-dot-com (mail04.mail.aol-dot-com [220.127.116.11]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA25160 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Thu, 22 Feb 1996 10:51:53 -0700
In a message dated 96-02-22 10:46:08 EST, you write:
>Still this arguement should not prevent the coil builder from
>constructing the ultimate Q secondary, as long as the price is
>both reasonable (time and money) and cost effective (time and
I recently priced acrylic and almost fainted. This alone is worth
pursuing my formless coil. By the way, since hardening, my
sample coil seems quite sturdy, still slightly flexible(won't crack easily)
and very light! I like the looks of the polyeutethane (nice and uniform).
Then varnish based one is more flexible, but not as nice looking(uneven
I was now going to try water based polyeurathane (polyacrylic), it
dries crystal clear. Any comments?
Kevin M. Conkey