Re: TC Electrostatics (fwd)

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: TC Electrostatics (fwd)
From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 09:50:57 -0800

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> >From lod-at-pacbell-dot-net Wed Dec 11 22:30:14 1996
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 20:19:00 -0800
> From: lod-at-pacbell-dot-net
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: TC Electrostatics (fwd)
> 
> 
> True, if you believe that rectification is the culprit here.  I however, do not.
> Richard Hull's explanation of the damped sinusoid's DC component is more likely, IMO.
> Flipping the primary phasing should change the induced polarity if this is correct.
> So far, R. Hull says that it does, and R. Wall says that it does not.
> 
> -GL

Greg,

As I mentioned in the other post.  Richard Wall appears correct.  I went 
back to my lab notes and yes, I flipped the leads to the primary of tbe 
AC system on August 15th 1996 and got a positive reading, though much 
more reduced.  It was hot and muggey in the lab that day.  I have never 
seen a positive indication out of the systems other than on that 
occasion!  Go figure.  I haven't a clue!!!!!!!

Does the earth have happy and sad days!  Happy ions (negative), ground 
sourced, most of the time, but mean ole postive ground supplied ions on 
rare occassions!  I think not!

Richard Hull, TCBOR