[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
SECONDARY SPACING ??
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: SECONDARY SPACING ??
-
From: richard.quick-at-slug-dot-org (Richard Quick)
-
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 02:09:00 GMT
-
>Received: from uustar.starnet-dot-net (root-at-uustar.starnet-dot-net [199.217.253.12]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA07595 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 21:43:34 -0700
Quoting gcerny-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com (Glenn Cerny):
> I watched this thread go by about a 12"dia form wound with
> 25ga. I understand and agree that the wire is way to small
> for this size coil and that space winding is a no, no.
> Would bi-filar winding work here though? For those who
> do not know, bi-filar is winding 2 parallel wires from
> top to bottom with the ends connected. I haven't heard
> of anyone currently using this method, but is it practical
> and without penalty?
No, bifilar winding does not help the overall design. It robs the
secondary coil of inductance needed to maintain performance per
unit volume of coil form.
I have posted at length previously about the use of trifilar
windings with the third conductor wound directly on top of a
bifilar winding. This would work where the available conductor is
50% smaller than the ideal conductor diameter. The end result of
a trifilar winding would be a high Q secondary, with reasonably
high inductance. But let me tell you, it is way more work than it
is worth. For the time involved I would go out and buy the right
diameter magnet wire and do the job correctly from the start.
Richard Quick
... If all else fails... Throw another megavolt across it!
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12