[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
UPDATE
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: UPDATE
-
From: richard.quick-at-slug-dot-org (Richard Quick)
-
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:01:00 GMT
-
>Received: from uustar.starnet-dot-net by csn-dot-net with SMTP id AA15486 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>); Mon, 27 Feb 1995 19:24:39 -0700
* Carbons Sent to: lisanap-at-cats.ucsc.edu
Quoting Mark Napier:
> Richard,
> I've been getting a lot done the last week or so. I have one
> rolled cap finished, except for the oil. My secondary is
> wound. I got 850 turns on it, and about 5 coats of varnish so
> far.
So far your looking very good!
> Next major assembly is the primary. Should the inside radius
> be one inch larger than the secondary radius? Or could it be
> larger to accomadate a larger secondary (6" dia) in the
> future?
Yes, and yes. The problem here is that there is a big jump
between a four inch coil and a six. I would reco two different
primaries for best performance, but you can trade off and make
one primary serve on two coils.
> Is there a problem placing the cap to close to the primary?
> (induction?)
There will be some effect from any conductive structure that is
too close to the primary/secondary field flux.
> Can I use the cap tank as a pedestal for the primary/secondary
> assembly?
You can do this on a small coil, but at higher powers I could see
where a problem or two might develop.
Richard Quick
... If all else fails... Throw another megavolt across it!
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12