[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Primary Q's and Spark Gaps (and magic formula)
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Primary Q's and Spark Gaps (and magic formula)
-
From: "Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
-
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 09:43:06 +1200
-
>Received: from rata.vuw.ac.nz (root-at-rata.vuw.ac.nz [130.195.2.11]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA25744 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 13:09:39 -0700
Mark,
re this...
> What do mean here by "hump" phenomena?
This is precisely what I see coming from the secondary when I single
shot the coil. As I said before, it is almost exactly like a DSBSC
moodulation waveform (time domain) with the modulating signal being
an exponentially decaying sinewave.
> By
> shorting the spark gap and using a signal generator on the primary, the
> two freqs are readily observed on the secondary, and from their split,
> K can be calculated directly...
Yep that's right. But you are tuning in each at a time doing this.
Until I finally decided to try operating the scope in the same room
as the coil (under power), that's all I was doing too.
(as an aside, you don't get the true primary Q doing this as of
course you know)
It's obvious that what I'm seeing is the trade of energy between the
primary and secondary. I liked your analogy. Thanks for the formulae.
I've not seen those ones before. It's obvious you have access to
references that I don't.
Malcolm