[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Scoping of Secondaries
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Scoping of Secondaries
-
From: "SROYS" <SROYS-at-radiology.ab.umd.edu>
-
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:10:15 EDT
-
>Received: from comm1.ab.umd.edu (comm1.ab.umd.edu [134.192.1.5]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA09458 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 08:39:51 -0700
After reading your post from the other day, I went home and played
around a little more with my scope and coil. I found out a few things...
1. You should turn all your equipment on and let it warm up for at least
1/2 to 1 hour before using it. I was sitting there watching my frequency
generator change frequency by a few Hz every couple seconds for
quite a while after I turned it on.
2. Series resistance does make a difference. I have a 0-10 mHz
Hewlett Packard signal generator that has 75 ohm and 600 ohm
outputs. When I used either the 600 ohm output from the signal
generator or the cable that has the 1K resistor wired in series , I
measured Q's in the neighborhood of 30-50. When I used the 75 ohm
output with a regular RG59 coax cable and no series resistor, I got a Q
of 200.
This raises some other questions. I'm assuming that a signal
generator with an even lower impedence would give an even more
accurate value for Q, but since I have what I have, is there any way to
compensate for this resistance? Also, rather than just believing the
label that says 75 ohms by the output jack, what can I do to confirm or
compute the actual impedence of my signal generator? Would I be
able to measure the open circuit voltage and the short circuit current (at
say, 60Hz) and use these values to calculate the internal resistance, or
is there something more complicated involved?
Steven Roys (sroys-at-radiology.ab.umd.edu)