Re: MMC cap preferences? (fwd)

["High Voltage list" <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: <sroys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:28:58 -0700
From: Dr. Resonance <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: MMC cap preferences? (fwd)




Yes, we still sell them.

Please contact my mom directly at tel 608-522-4378 for ordering details.  At
present we have 600 caps in stock,  0.15 uF 2 kV  the good C-D brand.

Dr. Resonance


> >
> > The prefered capacitors have metal foil instead of metallized plates,
> > they
> > can hadle more current.
>
>   Hmm, Ross Overstreet says metallized film is better than metal foil
> due to its "self healing" properties.  You and Terry say that metal
> foil is better due to increased current capability.
>
> So, who's right, or is this one of those religious arguments that may
> never be settled?
>
>
> > Also those caps from newark are very small capacitance.  The ones most
> > popular are made by Cornell Dubilier, they are 0.15 uF at 2000 VDC,
> > part number 942C20P15K.
>
> I didn't know about those C-D caps, clearly they are superior.
>
> >   They can be purchased though
> > Richardson Electronics, www.rell.com , in quantities of 28.  Dr
> > Resonance
> > was selling them too, but apparently he's not well,  I'm not sure if
> > his
> > company still sells them.
>
> Uh-oh, anybody know what's going on with Mr. Cox's health?
>
> ...........................................................
> The problem with using bleeding edge technology is that the
> blood that winds up on the floor is usually your own.
>
>
>
>