[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MMC cap preferences? (fwd)
- To: hvlist <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: MMC cap preferences? (fwd)
- From: "High Voltage list" <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:36:51 -0700 (MST)
- Delivered-to: hvarchiver@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: hvlist@poodle.pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <sroys@poodle.pupman.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:36:52 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <9RE7VB.A.M3F.DRQMCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: hvlist-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: <sroys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:28:25 -0700
From: Gomez Addams <gomez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Colorado Tesla Coilers <gnats@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: MMC cap preferences?
What is the current recommended basic capacitor from which to build MMC
banks? The reason I ask is that I just got a flyer from Newark
advertising a metallized propylene cap from Vishay, specifically
intended for high voltage, high frequency, high current, high pulse
applications.
Maximum pulse rise times range from 133v/uS to 9610v/uS depending on
lead spacing and voltage rating.
Highest rating: 1600 V, 0.047 uF, $1.65 ea. in singles. Newark stk#
65C0858, Vishay# MKP1841347134.
- B(G)L
........................................................................
........
“A physical experiment which makes a bang is always worth more than a
quiet one.
Therefore a man cannot strongly enough ask of Heaven: if it wants to
let him
discover something, may it be something that makes a bang. It will
resound into
eternity.” - Georg Christoph Lichtenberg 1742-1799