[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cheap parts for high-power resistive ballast (for pole transformer). (fwd)
- To: hvlist <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Cheap parts for high-power resistive ballast (for pole transformer). (fwd)
- From: "High Voltage list" <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 14:09:34 -0600 (MDT)
- Delivered-to: hvarchiver@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: hvlist@poodle.pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <sroys@poodle.pupman.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 14:09:37 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <JFXxU.A.duD._v1oCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: hvlist-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: <sroys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: J. Aaron Holmes <jaholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Cheap parts for high-power resistive ballast (for pole
transformer). (fwd)
No contest. But I acquired twelve 5kW water heater
elements and ten 40A relays for a total of about
$45.00 on eBay. At this point, it'll be far cheaper
and simpler to get to 50kVA input power this way than
trying to do so inductively. Optimum efficiency is
definitely a non-goal for this Jacob's ladder project
;-) I'll get an arc welder for my TC, as soon as I
find one locally for cheap. Where I am, used pigs are
easier to come by than used welders! :D
--- High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: <sroys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:53:34 -0700
> From: Dr. Resonance <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Cheap parts for high-power resistive
> ballast (for pole
> transformer). (fwd)
>
>
>
> For pole xmfr systems it's best to use an inductive
> external ballast. An
> airgap of 1/16th inch is filled with a tight fitting
> piece of plastic and
> epoxied in place. The gap is cut with a band saw.
>
> Dr. Resonance
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: J. Aaron Holmes
> <jaholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: Cheap parts for high-power resistive
> ballast (for pole
> > transformer).
> >
> > (this thread is getting long...oh well, the list
> is
> > pretty quiet, too)
> >
> > Okee dokey, I've got my new transformers. Yes,
> > there's an "s" on the end there; I picked up two.
> > When I got down to the salvage yard and saw how
> big
> > and heavy the 50kVA units were, I opted for two
> 25kVA
> > units instead. They'll do the same job but can
> > actually be moved by a human :) These 25kVA's are
> > actually smaller (the cans, that is) than my old
> > 15kVA! They're also about 20 years younger, which
> > probably explains it.
> >
> > Anyway, my intent when I picked up two was to run
> them
> > in parallel (or series for nearly 30kV--another
> bonus
> > to having two instead of one), but then I had
> another
> > thought: Several people have mentioned using
> > isolation transformers together with heater
> elements
> > to create a sort of hybrid resistive/inductive
> > ballast. That is, they talk about putting the
> > elements in series with one side of the isolation
> > transformer and the pig in series with the other
> side.
> > Does this really offer any advantages? Maybe for
> > Telsa coil operation it could improve the rise
> time
> > after the cap discharges...I suppose I can
> visualize
> > that...but for a Jacob's ladder? It's just a
> > continuous short circuit, so I don't see how this
> > isolation transformer arrangement accomplishes
> > anything. But I thought I'd ask. Perhaps I could
> use
> > the two low-voltage windings of one of the
> > transformers kind of like an isolation
> transformer,
> > with one winding in series with the heater
> elements
> > and the other in series with the other pig. It
> might
> > work :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Aaron, N7OE
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>