Re: 'Anti-parallel' ?? (fwd)

["High Voltage list" <hvlist-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: <sroys-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:32:41 -0500
From: ajones18-at-bellsouth-dot-net
To: High Voltage list <hvlist-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: 'Anti-parallel' ?? (fwd)

In <Pine.LNX.4.10.10411190951060.501-100000-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>, on
11/19/04 
   at 09:51 AM, "High Voltage list" <hvlist-at-pupman-dot-com> said:

>Original poster: <sroys-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>

>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:48:12 -0600
>From: Carl Litton <Carl_Litton-at-hilton-dot-com>
>To: High Voltage list <hvlist-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Subject: 'Anti-parallel' ??

>I threw this out as part of a larger issue a few days ago and I wanted to
>see if anyone would be willing to hazard a guess as to what the term
>'anti-parallel' means?  The context is almost always in the wiring of 2
>transformer primaries in parallel in preparation for putting the
>secondaries in series.  


I wired my two H&R transformers together this way. I was told that wiring
the primaries in parallel and the secondaries in series was called
'anti-parallel'.

Alan Jones
KI4ATV