[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Design data for VDGRF experimenters (fwd)
- To: <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Design data for VDGRF experimenters (fwd)
- From: Steven Roys <sroys@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:01:36 -0700 (MST)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:43:46 -0800
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Design data for VDGRF experimenters (fwd)
Useful stuff here, but I have a question about notation:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:00:52 -0600
>From: Dr. Resonance <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Design data for VDGRF experimenters
>
>
>I'm posting some design data for Van de Graaff designers and experimenters:
>
>
>The spark discharges occur as "bright" with a lot of capacitance and
>"weak" with less capacitance due to small ground terminals, etc.
>
>Bright spark output to insulating column ratio:
>
> Bs / Tl = 2.3:1 ratio (43%) where:
>
>Bs = bright spark length in inches
>
>Tl = tube length in inches
Does this mean that a tubelength of, say, 1 meter, would produce sparks of
2.3 meters, or 1/2.3 = .43 meters? Seems like the latter would be more
reasonable.
>Weak spark output to insulating column ratio:
>
> Ws / Tl = 1.4:1 ratio where:
>
>Ws = weak spark length in inches
Likewise.
I assume weak sparks are longer than bright sparks (70 cm vs 43 cm, for a 1
meter tube)
Jim