[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] Was Primary Grounding now RF gnd Center ball safety gap



On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 21:50, bartb <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There is another "safety gap" idea we could devise so that we won't care
> about primary strikes (thus eliminating worries of primary configurations or
> strike rings). The outer primary is most often hit (yes?). Run a wire down
> from the outer turn of the primary to a classic \/ configuration to RF
> ground, greater than the primary outer turn voltage, but a place where
> terminal strikes are forced to go. Performs the same situation as a strike
> ring without the strike ring near the primary. So, you still end up with the
> benefits of a strike ring but without the need of a strike ring.


Can you clarify this?
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla