[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:15:42 -0600 (MDT)
From: Chip Atkinson <chip@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE:  Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)

I was in a party store a while back and they had what looked like small
conical coil forms.  They were kind of like a megaphone and I believe were
made of polyethylene or polypropylene.  There are also the old style
megaphones that may be sold at places that sell college "spirit" stuff.

As far as softish coil forms, I've wound kite string on a spool on a windy
day and the spool is crushed by the additive force of each lap.  If you
wind the wire on a softish form, be careful of the amount of tension you
use.  Each turn adds up and before you know it you can deform the form.

Here's a store that sells conical coil forms for $20.00!

http://shop.justforkix.com/products.asp?dept=4&gclid=CPXyztXd34wCFQQRYwodd28i7g

I searched for "cheerleader megaphone"

Chip

On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Tesla list wrote:

> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:40:48 -0700
> From: Anthony R. Mollner <penny831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE:  Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)
> 
> I agree with you Finn and I was also thinking that a slightly porous form
> might make the wire all the easier because the windings would be able to
> stay put while winding. Some kind or lathe turned coil form would be ideal.
> Obviously, the thicker the gage of the wire, the easier it would be to keep
> them from cross winding. Just my thoughts on that.
> Tony
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 5:14 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:26:16 +0200
> From: Finn Hammer <f-h@xxxx>
> To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [] conical secondary (fwd)
> 
> All,
> 
> I`d say that if you wind it from the skinny end towards the fat end,
> winding should not pose any problems at all. In fact, it should be
> easier, since the wire will tend to snuggle close together (good)
> without any special effort.
> The coilform could be made in any number of ways. I think I`l wait to
> decide how, until I need one.
> 
> Guess this didn`t help much.
> 
> Cheers, Finn Hammer
> 
> Tesla list skrev:
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:26:38 -0700
> > From: Anthony R. Mollner <penny831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [] conical secondary (fwd)
> >
> > Speaking of conical secondary, does anyone have any suggestions on making
> > them and the coil form it self?
> > Tony
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>