Re: BPS vs. Resonant frequency (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:04:36 EDT
From: FutureT@xxxxxxx
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BPS vs. Resonant frequency (fwd)

 
In a message dated 7/5/2007 3:34:48 P.M. US Eastern Standard Time,  
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

Hey  all,
Here is a theoretical question for you guys.   Would there be any 
advantage to designing a TC secondary system, so that  it's resonant 
frequency would be a harmonic, multiple, x octaves above,  etc, of the BPS 
(for example 122.88kHz for 120 BPS)?  Just  curious.
Scott Bogard.



Scott,
 
No, there's no advantage to doing that.
 
John



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.