[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dwell time, etc



Original poster: FutureT@xxxxxxx In a message dated 3/30/06 1:51:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

David,

Yes, I believe that is likely the case.

John


Hi John, Gary,

Maybe this would also explain why I have never been able to get a
4-gap asynch rotary gap to operate without
extremely erratic firing that often destroys some of the upstream
primary circuit or control circuit components
with the nasty resultant kickbacks? This problem com-
pletely disappears once I bypass the extra 2 gaps and
go with just 2 gaps.

David Rieben



----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: Dwell time, etc


>Original poster: FutureT@xxxxxxx
The problem with such a
>fast dwell (such as when using offset), is that it may
>actually inhibit the gap from firing I believe, and
>give similar effects to using a too-wide rotary gap spacing.
>So the negative factor may be cancelling any positive
>effect of the fast mechanical dwell.
>John