[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PFC Question
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PFC Question
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:16:13 -0700
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:17:09 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <rVN3YD.A.syG.og6bDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi Dmitry,
> Thankyou for your explaination, I understand where you are coming
> from, no inductance if the coupling k=1.
yes, coz i live in the ideal world, not real one, sorry :-)
but the leakage inductance is present anywhere - in any device, that`s
why i didn`t think you were speaking just about it - sorry again.
however, for k=0.99 -jwL=0.00125L (WORST case), so like Mr Conner
said, in the real world leakage inductance may be about 1mH.
> This leakage inductance also explains why SRSG's need to be rephased
> as the variac output is brought up.
let`s see - 1mH in the primary it`s 1.6H in the secondary of my mot stack,
it`s 4% of my charging inductance, so no - absolutely no any rephasing
needed (if only 200v difference (WORST case) bothers you at 20kv voltage).
and i`ll use variac exclusively for the slowly voltage increasing - coz
at 110v sparks are not so long as at 220v, aren`t they? :-)
-----
Neon transformers are doomed in Tesla service! I should know, I've
killed more of 'em than many pople have ever even seen in a life time.
25-03-96 (c) Richard Hull, TCBOR