[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Streamer V/I and energy balance
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Streamer V/I and energy balance
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:32:04 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:33:43 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <b7mh_B.A.ieC.2i54CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Denicolai, Marco" <Marco.Denicolai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Terry,
Great that you did the same energy balance check on your data! Thank you.
It is interesting to see that also you measured V and I of different polarity.
The fact that the final energy is "the same at the end as the first
peak" doesn't bother me. What does bother me is that the streamer
energy "decreases" at some point. The streamer should be a net
consumer, not a reactive energy storage. At least not so much
reactive (capacitance should be pretty low). I'm just refusing to
accept the streamer is "feeding back" the TC.
Any clue anybody or are we just after some measurement artifact?
Best Regards
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sun 7/24/2005 2:44 AM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Streamer V/I and energy balance
>Not sure what it means but maybe the drop in your energy at the end
>is some oscillations or something to do with a lower band width. In
>my high bandwidth case, I get a lot of ripple, but the power ends up
>the same at the end as the first peak.