[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Terry's Test - Two Manifestations of Charge



Original poster: "David Thomson" <dwt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Mark,

> "aether" seems to conjure too much acrimony these days.

Yes, it does.  But the effect is purely psychological.  The data
doesn't care what it is called.

> What I meant
> to say is that one spark appears to be carrying more current
than the
> other, a statement which is based off decades of research on
> spark discharges.

That's interesting.  That is exactly what I hypothesize, too.  In
fact, the two types of charge I have quantified show that
electrons align along electrostatic dipoles in the "vacuum" when
the potential is high and the current is low, and they align
along electromagnetic dipoles in the "vacuum" when the potential
is low and the current is high.  My theory also shows that as
electrons migrate en masse to the topload, their potential
increases and current decrease, and when they migrate en masse to
the ground the potential decreases and the current increases.  In
other words, there is an orthogonal phase change in the overall
"shape" of the group of electrons.

When I first noticed what appeared to me as two distinct
manifestations of charge, I wondered if this effect could be
quantified.  It quantifies nicely, not only numerically and in
units, but also geometrically.  It is possible to easily model
the electron behavior with values and units and in space-time
with this system.  The model essentially looks like a bunch of
moving Lego blocks.  You can actually visualize the physical
qualities of the electrons.

It really doesn't bother me that others would rather choose to
keep the system they have for modeling coil behavior, and I'm not
going to do anything to upset the cart.  However, whether people
decide to use the present system or my system, both are
established on the same data.  These experiments are very useful
for me.  To begin with, I'm glad to see that others can produce
the same effect, even if they have a different interpretation of
what they think causes the effect.  I'm learning a lot from you
guys and I'm very grateful for it.

Dave