Re: double wrapped secondary

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <tesla123-at-pacbell-dot-net>



Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "Malcolm Watts by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>
>
> On 13 Nov 2001, at 7:50, Tesla list wrote:
>
> > Original poster: "maykrug by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> <mf31-at-qwest-dot-net>
> >
> > all the examples i've seen, references heard, suggest that all the
> > secondaries are a single wrap
> > of wire from end to end. ?, what are the expected results of having a
> > second layer wrapped back
> > on top of the first,obviously one continuous length.
>
> And connected to the first layer in which way? Consider the
> implications if they are not wired directly in parallel.
>
> Malcolm

Yep. And also consider when you parallel the windings, you may as well just
wind a single layer.

--
Barton B. Anderson
http://www.classictesla-dot-com