[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fw: Re: Fanciful spark-augmenter

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Fanciful spark-augmenter
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 13:23:14 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20010601.142634.-3935047.9.kcha1-at-juno-dot-com>
Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 13:23:44 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <SCKbiC.A.5ED.-0TG7-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>

Hi Ken,

At 02:26 PM 6/1/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>
>Why didn't I apply...*kick*...for a PATENT on this...*kick, kick*...??
>
>Ken Herrick

We could always name it after you!  Instead of a "Tesla coil" it could be a
"Herrick coil" or something.  Maybe you can think of a nice name for it.
That would probably be better than a patent anyway...

Of course, if it should turn out to be a flop, we can quickly forget :-))

Cheers,

	Terry

Prev by Date: Herrick's goofs/s.s. documentation
Next by Date: Re: shortcut?
Prev by thread: Re: Fanciful spark-augmenter
Next by thread: Re: Fanciful spark-augmenter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread