[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Triggered gap questions



Original poster: "Basura, Brian by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <brian.basura-at-unistudios-dot-com>

Luc,

Good information except that paper has the name Marconi on it (Yuck..) . :)

Anyway back on topic, I've made a couple of trigatrons from scratch. If you
want to see pictures of their construction, firing circuit details, and
application check either of the following URL's

http://fp2.hughes-dot-net/brianb/pulse_discharge.htm (the trigatron is about
half way down the page)

http://users.better-dot-org/roverstreet/projects/Pulse/pulse.htm

Regards,
Brian B.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com] 
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 6:07 AM
To:	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject:	Re: Triggered gap questions

Original poster: "Luc by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<ludev-at-videotron.ca>

Hi Mike

I have a paper that could interested you on my download site:

http://homepage.mac-dot-com/ludev/

When there open the folder "Tesla" and download the document
"3elec_sg.pdf" It's really interesting and I'll try to base my
future trigger gap in this concept ( the trigger electrode out of
the way of the 2 main electrodes ).  

Cheers,

Luc Benard

Tesla list wrote:
> 
> Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<Hollmike-at-aol-dot-com>
> 
> Ok,  Here's a question for the triggered gap gurus:
>     I have been reading this thread with much interest.  It sounds like a
> great alternative to the SRSG!    One thing I read is that the primary
> current passes 'through' the trigger electrode.  My question is, could the
> trigger electrode be positioned slightly out of alignment with the primary
> gap electrodes so the triggered arc would have to take a slightly 'bent'
> path?  This, if so, would seem to me to help alleviate heating and/or
> corrosion of the trigger electrode.
>    It would seem that the trigger electrode could be made into a sharp
point
> and cause the ionization of the space between the gap electrodes

I'll try a flyback circuit too, because may be the RF corona from
it could be sufficient to trigger the gap ???? 



 to provide
> the conductive channel to form more easily and not actually have the
primary
> current contact the trigger electrode at all(or very little anyway).   If
the
> trigger electrode were positioned from below the primary gap electrodes,
the
> heat might also help 'move' the arc away from the trigger electrode.
>  The first objection to this idea, I imagine, is that might argue that
this
> would effectively make the gap too wide and kill a NST, but if one placed
> another gap or two in series, the triggered gap could have a large
percentage
> length change, but the overall gap length would not change by much.
Having
> the series gaps would also seem to aid quenching as well.
> Comments?
> Mike
> 
>