RE: List archives available on www.pupman-dot-com again

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Chris Brick" <cbrick-at-rebelbase-dot-com> 

I'm not sure what tools you are using to do this.  One of the ways I have 
done this is the past is to change the "-at-" in all the email addresses to " 
at ".  When someone wants to use the address, it is pretty easy to change back.

Spammers use programs that scour the net and harvest all the addresses 
found.  It is only a matter of time before the Tesla archives are hit.

Chris

At 04:05 PM 12/1/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>Original poster: "Atkinson, Chip" <CAtkinson-at-Circadence-dot-com>
>
>Hmmm..  From the few replies, it appears that concealing the poster is not
>desired.  I'll stop doing that and see if there's some other way to obscure
>addresses from spammers yet allow them to be seen by web users.
>
>Chip
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:42 PM
> > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Subject: Re: List archives available on www.pupman-dot-com again
> >
> >
> > Original poster: Clearspring1-at-aol-dot-com
> >
> > Hi Chip,
> >
> > >  The November archives have the email addresses obscured to
> > prevent spam
> > >  harvesters from getting them.  The disadvantage is that
> > you don't know who
> > >  posted the messages.  Let me know what you think about
> > this practice.
> >
> > Personally I find the authorship invaluable, and sometimes
> > search by author
> > as well as subject.  It seems clear to me that posts by some of the
> > heavyweights warrant greater scrutiny than those of
> > lightweights such as
> > myself :-)  I hope there is a way to keep this information...
> >
> > Michael Tandy
> >
> >
> >