[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Secondary Theory (Was Bipolar Coil)-Heretical view



On Sun, 23 May 1999 20:20:31 -0600, Tesla List wrote:

> Original Poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br> 
> 
> Dr. Resonance wrote:
> 
> > If you have a medium to large coil try this experiment.  Remove the sec
coil
> > and place it 8-10 feet away on a suitable insulating stand.  Now tap
into
> > the normal primary coil and feed this to the bottom of the sec coil.
It
> > does require some retuning and is a bit more difficult as you now have
two
> > taps to more around, but the results are very interesting.  I would ask
> > anyone on the list to try this with some of their coils -- you will be
> > amazed at how well this works out.   You can eventually enclosed the
pri
> > with taps into a large box and just feed the output over to your
elevated
> > sec coil.
> 
> This is known in old literature as the Seibt circuit:
> The excitator:        http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/ressona1.jpg
> Secondary coils:      http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/ressona2.jpg
> The interconnection:  http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/ressona3.jpg
> The complete circuit: http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/eln4382.jpg
> A variation:          http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/mk95943.jpg
> 
> Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz
Given the fact that the primary and secondary
are no longer magnetically coupled in this
circuit (thats what I understand is being done here),
does not this diminish the arcing effects on
the secondary as compared with the same model in a conventional magnetically
coupled sense? HDN





_______________________________________________________
Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite-dot-com/