Re: Sonotube loss corrections

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Sonotube loss corrections
• From: "D.C. Cox" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:57:41 -0700
• Approved: twf-at-verinet-dot-com

to: Nick

The perspex has a very high "creepage" factor, especially with RF.  Stick
with the sonotube -- it will work fine.

DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net


----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Sonotube loss corrections
> Date: Monday, January 11, 1999 3:52 AM
> 
> Original Poster: NickandSim-at-aol-dot-com 
> 
> To All,
>          my new coil form idea is about 24 perspex rods in a rough circle
with
> the windings around the outside and a series of wooden formers holding
the
> shape.
> 
>                                      Nick Field
> 

• Prev: Re: One more thing
• Next: Toroid spinning Videotape, tape 22 is ready
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread